For regulated organisations
Run armor360 inside your own environment, the AI included, so alert data can stay within your organisation’s boundaries. Every verdict shows its evidence, and every approval is on record.
Banks, insurers, health providers and public bodies want help with their alert queue, but not at the price of sending security data outside.
Alerts carry user names, machine names, internal addresses and fragments of what people were doing. Sending them to an outside AI service raises questions your data protection officer will rightly ask.
A verdict on its own is not enough. Auditors and regulators ask why an alert was closed, who decided and on what evidence. An answer of "the AI said so" will not pass.
A tool that changes machines or accounts on its own can disrupt a payment run or a clinical system. Many organisations need every change made by a named person, with approval recorded.
Switching off a detection rule or changing a setting can open a gap nobody notices. Those changes need more than one pair of eyes and a record that shows who agreed.
Platform and model inside your boundary, fallback off, people deciding.
armor360 runs on its own AI model, fine-tuned by our team, and it can run fully on-premises on your own hardware. With external AI fallback switched off, investigations run without alert data leaving your environment. If you would rather not run it yourself, it can be hosted for you instead.
Every record the agent collected is kept and cited where it is used. Each verdict links back to the event, lookup or log line behind it, so anyone reviewing a closed alert can see what was checked, what was found and why the agent reached its conclusion.
The investigation map shows the alert, the machine and accounts involved, the data sources read, each question the agent asked, the verdict and the recommended next steps. The path that backs the verdict is drawn in red, so a reviewer can trace the reasoning at a glance.
armor360 does not change your machines, accounts or network. It detects, investigates and tells a person. When an attack needs a plan, every step waits for someone to approve it. Who approved what, and when, is kept in the audit trail.
A detection rule goes live only when a person approves it, and switching a rule off needs two administrators to agree. Sign-in works through Okta, Microsoft Entra ID or any OIDC provider, or a password with a second step, and armor360 asks you to confirm again before sensitive changes.
armor360 and its own model run on your hardware, inside your network. With external AI fallback switched off, investigations stay within your environment.
The agent investigates each alert and keeps each record it reads, numbered and cited where it is used, with the path to the verdict drawn on the map.
A reviewer agrees with the verdict or changes it. Plan steps wait for approval, and armor360 makes no change to your machines, accounts or network.
Who approved what, and when, is kept in the audit trail, along with rule approvals and the two administrators needed to switch a rule off.
Our own model, fine-tuned by our team, running on your hardware inside your environment, with external AI fallback switched off if you choose.
Who approved what and when, kept for every verdict change, detection rule and plan step, ready for review.
Each verdict links to the records behind it, so a closed alert can be explained later.
Turning a detection rule off needs two administrators to agree, so a gap in detection is never opened quietly by one person.
Okta, Microsoft Entra ID or any OIDC provider, or a password with a second step.
Investigations shared as HTML, Word or PDF reports, written for the people who receive them.
It need not. armor360 can run fully on-premises, the AI included, on your own hardware. With external AI fallback switched off, alerts, the data the agent reads and its findings stay inside your environment.
Notifications and tickets go only to the channels you connect, such as your own Microsoft Teams or ServiceNow, so you choose what leaves and where it goes.
It gives you records an auditor can follow: each verdict with the evidence it cites, the investigation map showing how the agent got there, and an audit trail of who approved what and when. Rule changes are controlled, and switching a rule off needs two administrators.
It does not make you compliant on its own. It gives your team a clear, checkable account of how each alert was handled, which is what auditors usually ask to see.
It takes no response action. It does not isolate machines, lock accounts or change network settings. It detects, investigates and recommends, and a named person decides and acts. Plan steps wait for approval, and the approval is recorded.
It makes two kinds of change to your tools, each only after a person approves: adding missing log collection through Elastic Fleet, and switching detection rules on in Elastic. Switching a rule off needs two administrators.
That matters in regulated settings, where a change made by software at the wrong moment can disrupt a payment run or a clinical system. With armor360, every change is approved by someone you can name.
Start a free pilot on your own alerts, or put in your own numbers first.
