Skip to content

About armor360

The first look, done properly. The decision, left to people.

We build armor360 for security teams that have more alerts than hours. It does the digging; your people decide.

Why we built it.

Most of security operations is finding out whether an alert matters. That work is skilled, slow and mostly ends in “nothing to see”.

  • Alerts outrun people

    Teams get more alerts than they can read, so some are never looked at, and the real ones wait in line.

  • Skill is scarce

    The people who know which question to ask next are the hardest to hire and the easiest to lose.

  • Answers you cannot check

    An investigation that lives in one person’s head cannot be reviewed, repeated or handed over.

  • Data that cannot leave

    Many organisations cannot send security data to someone else’s AI, whatever it promises.

What we hold to

A few rules shape every part of the product, and this website.

  • People decide. armor360 recommends; it takes no action on your systems.
  • Show the working. Every claim in a verdict cites the record behind it.
  • Your data stays yours. It can run fully on-premises, the AI included.
  • Honest numbers. Figures from our lab are named as the lab’s, and we publish no customer results because we do not have them yet.

How we test it

We run real attack tools against our own lab machines and check that the agent reaches the right verdict, with evidence a person can follow. We also feed it logs written to fool it, and check that none turns an attack into a harmless verdict. A change to the agent ships when it holds up on both.

Our own AI

armor360 runs on its own model, fine-tuned by our team for security investigation, so it can run on your hardware at about $0.10 of compute per investigation.

What we mean by showing the working.

A real investigation from our lab: every question the agent asked, and the path from the alert to its verdict.

How the agent reached its verdictFrom our lab
AlertMachineData sourcesQuestionsVerdictBurst of reconlinux04Asset infoHost alertsSearch eventsCheck indicatorsbackoffice, pscat, grepcaldera-agentpython3+ 9 moreReal attack, 90%
Our lab investigation of a hidden adversary-simulation agent: 4 data sources, 13 questions, 22 records kept, and a verdict of real attack at 90% confidence. The red path is what backs the verdict.
13questions asked
22records kept as evidence
4data sources read
90%confidence: real attack
5m 35sfrom alert to verdict

Lab results, not customer data: one of our deepest investigations, of an adversary-simulation agent on a Linux machine. Across all our lab runs the median is 76 s.

What armor360 is, and is not.

  • An AI SOC analyst

    It investigates alerts and writes verdicts your team can check.

  • Not a response tool

    It never isolates, locks or blocks. People act.

  • Built on your tools

    It works with the SIEM and endpoint tools you already run.

  • Fair to your budget

    Priced by quote, with no charge per person.

  • On your hardware

    Fully on-premises if you need it, AI included.

  • Reviewed by people

    Your team agrees with or changes every verdict.

See where your team’s time goes. Then decide.

Start a free pilot on your own alerts, or put in your own numbers first.